ChatGPT very impressive, not Genius
Yeah, I've seen some of ChatGPT writings. Although it is impressive and will replace a lot of general public level copywriting (and probably layoff a lot of those level writers), it still can't think of new ways of interpreting meaning. It relies on what has already been said, how it's been said, and the rules of grammar. It can't think of things like what I've written about, for example, the word "Empirical" not meaning "Based on Experience" as all the dictionaries and quotes say it means, rather I say that the word "Experiential" means "based on experience" and that "Empirical" is that subset of "Experiential" that is useful for building an Empire (clearly the root word of "Empirical" is "Empire"). Statistically "Empirical" is limited to 3 Standard Deviations from the Mean Average of a Statistical Distribution Curve; whereas "Experiential" includes those 3 Standard Deviations (i.e. 99.7% of all phenomena) plus the remaining tail ends that fade into Infinity containing the remaining 0.3% of Phenomena. This is important because this incorrect usage of "Empirical" hides the discrimination against experiences that can't be used for Empire Building, given their infrequent occurrence, unreliability, higher dimensionality, and/or extremely short duration of occurrence. This is an original realization of mine. No one else has said or written this as far as I have seen - I've checked the dictionaries and encyclopedias and have done Google searches - it is my original realization. A.I. cannot yet figure such things out.
Comments
Post a Comment